Obviously no, because the factors that would cause extreme weather events are not yet there.
In general, any abstract model has the same relationships to actual reality as cartoons - they look sort of plausible and even convincing, even when a cat or a mouse speaks perfect English.
There should be a clear warning statement, like with GMO labeling, that models are astrology with numbers instead of planets and stars.
And no, no matter how sophisticated, a model will never be more than a cartoon, in the same way that a map would never be a territory.
In general, any abstract model has the same relationships to actual reality as cartoons - they look sort of plausible and even convincing, even when a cat or a mouse speaks perfect English.
There should be a clear warning statement, like with GMO labeling, that models are astrology with numbers instead of planets and stars.
And no, no matter how sophisticated, a model will never be more than a cartoon, in the same way that a map would never be a territory.