Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The precedent for the illegality of IQ tests for employment is Griggs v Duke Power Co. [1] if I'm not mistaken. The court ruled:

> The Act proscribes not only overt discrimination, but also practices that are > fair in form, but discriminatory in operation. The touchstone is business > necessity. If an employment practice which operates to exclude Negroes cannot > be shown to be related to job performance, the practice is prohibited.

(apologies for the dated and offensive language, starring it out seemed like it would imply a different and more offensive term so I left it as is)

My reading of it is that IQ tests aren't broadly illegal, but the employer would have to demonstrate that it's somehow related to job performance. E.g. one employer refused to hire people with too high of an IQ, and the courts ruled that was a reasonable (if unwise) justification [2].

I'm doubtful any case challenging LeetCode tests on the same grounds would succeed. I think it would be exceptionally difficult to convince a court that solving coding problems is unrelated to a programmer's job performance.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griggs_v._Duke_Power_Co.

2: https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/st...



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: