Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> imagine a CEO who acquires an AI assistant. They begin by giving it simple, low-level assignments, like drafting emails and suggesting purchases. As the AI improves over time, it progressively becomes much better at these things than their employees. So the AI gets “promoted.” Rather than drafting emails, it now has full control of the inbox. Rather than suggesting purchases, it’s eventually allowed to access bank accounts and buy things automatically

Ok let’s pause for a second and observe the slippery way the author has described “AI” progress. In the author’s world, this AI isn’t just a limited tool, it’s a self-improving independent agent. It’s an argument that relies on the existence of something that doesn’t presently exist, solving problems that won’t exist by the time it gets here. We already have tools that can draft emails and suggest purchases. The email drafts require oversight and…no one trusts product recommendation. And importantly, they are non overlapping. It turns out that specialization in one area doesn’t transfer. No matter how good you are at writing emails, it doesn’t lend itself to running a company.



>imagine a CEO who acquires an AI assistant

>So the AI gets “promoted.” Rather than drafting emails, it now has full control of the inbox

Yeah that premise is absurd. Why would anyone 'promote' an AI system rather than using another, specialized AI system to do that other specific task?


>Why would...?

Because they trust the trained intelligence to behave predictably, which is a typical reason for promotion.


because your average CEO doesn't know AI from Auto-reply and inbox rules.they know AI is the hot new thing and they gotta have it.


> in the author’s world, this AI is... a self-improving independent agent

That's not necessarily true, it could also be a product maintained by a third party that receives upgrades over time.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: