They're quite different, I think. Some advantages with claude-run include:
- You make standard Markdown files directly executable using a shebang line.
- No special Markdown formatting or syntax needed. The Markdown itself is clean and standard, rather than using variable placeholders or any kind of special syntax.
- Regular filenames work: no special filename format needed. It just works like regular shell scripts with flags and piping
- Works with any text file format and file extension (xml, yaml, .ag etc)
- Includes support for session isolation
- Keeps script use separate from your regular Claude Code subscription
- Allows you to specify the provider cloud / model in scripts, or switch them on the fly.
It is intended to be more unix-like in philosophy.
- You make standard Markdown files directly executable using a shebang line.
- No special Markdown formatting or syntax needed. The Markdown itself is clean and standard, rather than using variable placeholders or any kind of special syntax.
- Regular filenames work: no special filename format needed. It just works like regular shell scripts with flags and piping
- Works with any text file format and file extension (xml, yaml, .ag etc)
- Includes support for session isolation
- Keeps script use separate from your regular Claude Code subscription
- Allows you to specify the provider cloud / model in scripts, or switch them on the fly.
It is intended to be more unix-like in philosophy.